Emord & Associates is dedicated to serving the needs of its national client base. The firm’s attorneys represent clients in constitutional and administrative law cases before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the National Park Service (NPS), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

FDA  | USDA | Import | Export | FTC | Advertising | Compliance | Dietary Supplements | Foods | Labeling | Prescription & OTC Drugs | Cosmetics | Animal Feeds & Supplements | DEA  | Controlled Substances | Medicare | Licensing | Commercial Litigation | Contracts | Business | Civil Litigation | Constitutional Law

Copyright © 2010 Emord & Associates, P.C.  All rights reserved | Sitemap  | Washington, D.C. | Virginia | Arizona

Alliance for Natural Health-USA Files Public Comment Challenging the FDA’s Guidance on New Dietary Ingredients (December 2, 2011)

The Alliance for Natural Health-USA (“ANH”) filed public comments with the FDA on December 2, 2011 calling the FDA’s interpretation of the DSHEA and its New Dietary Ingredient provisions “outrageous.”  FDA accepted public comments in response to its July 2011 Guidance document concerning the New Dietary Ingredient statute, 21 U.S.C. 350b.  Under the FDA guidance, the ANH explained that between 22,240 and 41,700 nutritional supplements would likely be removed from the market, at an economic loss of between $5.6 billion and $10.5 billion.  Moreover, ANH explains that the FDA’s interpretation of the NDI statute is legally infirm and without authority.

• Click to read Emord & Associates’ Press Release
• Click to read the ANH-USA’s Press Release
• Click to read the Public Comments