July 6, 1999
PETITIONERS:
Julian M. Whitaker, MD; Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw; American
Preventive Medical Association; and Pure Encapsulations, Inc.
ADDRESS:
c/o Emord & Associates, P.C.
 1050 Seventeenth Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
SUBJECT:
Petition for Health Claim: Vitamin E Dietary Supplements and Heart Disease
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Food Labeling (HFS-150)
200 C Street, SW
Washington, DC 20204
The undersigned, Julian M. Whitaker, M.D.; Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw; the American Preventive Medical Association; and Pure Encapsulations, Inc. (collectively, "Petitioners"), pursuant to Section 403 (r)(5)(D) of the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FDCA) (21 USC § 343(r)(5)(D)), submit this petition for a health claim concerning the relationship between the consumption of vitamin E dietary supplements and heart disease. Attached hereto, and constituting a part of this petition, are all of the items specified in 21 CFR § 101.70 (f). The text of the proposed model claim is set forth in section IV of this petition.
Petitioners believe this petition represents a logical and valid evaluation of the scientific studies and clinical trials concerning the relationship between vitamin E and heart disease. Those studies demonstrate that: (1) LDL oxidation increases cardiovascular disease risk, (2) increased consumption of vitamin E inhibits LDL oxidation, and (3) increased consumption of vitamin E, with attendant inhibition of LDL oxidation and platelet adhesion, thus lowers cardiovascular disease risk. The scientific evidence justifies permitting a health claim that links consumption of vitamin E with a reduction in cardiovascular disease risk (See, Pryor Report, Attachment 2).
Such a health claim directly responds to a major public health concern in the United States: cardiovascular disease accounts for more deaths per year than any other disease or group of diseases. 21 CFR § 101.75(b). Moreover, vitamin E offers a safe, inexpensive, readily accessible means for reducing cardiovascular disease risks population wide. (Davey (1998) and Bendich (1997)). Risk factors for heart disease are similar for both men and women (Arnold and Underwood, 1993; Aronow, 1996). Conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors include age, gender, heredity, inactivity, smoking, high cholesterol, hypertension, and diabetes (Aronow, 1996). While some risk factors can be reduced with simple changes in diet and lifestyle, other risk factors, such as age, gender, and heredity, are currently incapable of reduction. Additional factors, such as high cholesterol, hypertension, and diabetes, can require costly and hazardous therapies to reduce risk. By contrast, supplementing the diet with vitamin E is less costly and burdensome. It offers a meaningful reduction of cardiovascular disease risk without a reduction in quality of life. See, Davey (1998), Bendich (1997); Pryor Report. The proposed health claim asserts a feasible means of reducing cardiovascular disease risk and serves U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) policy by addressing a significant health problem in the U.S. population. See, 61 Fed. Reg. 296, 297 (Jan. 4, 1996).
A diet supplemented with vitamin E offers health benefits that may reduce the occurrence or severity of cardiovascular disease. (Pryor Report, Attachment 2). Coronary artery disease costs more than $8 billion annually in health-care costs and more than $60 billion annually in lost productivity (Keaney, 1994). Recent studies indicate that a significant number of individuals can benefit from improved cardiovascular outcomes as a result of increased consumption of vitamin E (Tables 1 and 2). (Davey, 1998). Furthermore, experts estimate an annual savings of $5 billion a year can be realized "as a result of reduced CHD hospitalizations associated with vitamin E supplementation" (200-400 IU/day) (Bendich, 1997; Davey, 1998). Those cost savings do not account for savings from decreased physician fees, outpatient services, and prescriptions, or saved lost workproductivity costs. Considering efficacy, cost effectiveness, safety, and the potential lives saved, greater use of vitamin E resulting from awareness of the proposed health claim will serve the national interest and DHHS policy. It is imperative that FDA act rapidly and allow use of the petitioned health claims as soon as possible, thereby minimizing the risk of avoidable cardiac deaths and/or increased heart disease morbidity that can be prevented by increased intake of supplemental vitamin E.
Vitamin E has always been a natural component of the American diet. Vitamin E is found in a variety of conventional foods. 66.4% of dietary vitamin E is obtained from fats and oils. An additional 11.5% come from meats, poultry, fish, eggs, dairy products,, sugars, sweeteners and miscellaneous foods. A total of 77.9% of the dietary sources for vitamin E are within the categories of foods that the Surgeon General has determined should be dramatically reduced by Americans. USDA and DHHS (PHS) Nutrition Monitoring in the United States: An Update Report on Nutrition Monitoring, Sept. 1989 (Kushi, 1999). Even without restricting fat and cholesterol containing foods, it is difficult if not impossible to consumeenough foods in conventional form that contain enough vitamin E to obtain the known heart health benefits. Only a supplemental source of synthetic or natural vitamin E can ensure that efficacious quantitiesof are ingested daily (Pryor Report at 2).
The limited amount of vitamin E available in the average diet and, more significantly, the levels expected to be found in a heart healthy diet low in fat and cholesterol make vitamin E supplementation an essential alternative to achieve population wide cardiovascular disease risk reduction. See, USDA and DHHS, Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States--Executive Summary, 1995; Pryor Report at 2, Attachment 2. The scientific studies described in this petition directly address this important public health issue and further national and DHHS policies by addressing cost effective means of reducing cardiovascular disease risk.
The underlying scientific data demonstrate that daily consumption of vitamin E will reduce cardiovascular disease risk. More than 40 human studies between 1987 and 1999, when taken as a whole, justify approval of the petitioned claim (Pryor Report at 2, 33; Tables 1 and 2). The scientific data provide substantial evidence of the cardiovascular benefits resulting from daily consumption of vitamin E.
Petitioners believe that the truthful and succinct health information conveyed by their proposed health claim will enable consumers to make prudent and effective choices about their health care and lifestyles. Labeling dietary supplements with the proposed vitamin E health claim would augment previously published statements by DHHS concerning the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The petitioned claim will accurately impart to consumers the scientific understanding about the relationship between vitamin E and the risks of cardiovascular disease, enabling them to make better informed choices in the marketplace.
Consistent with the decision in Pearson v. Shalala, 164 F.3d 650, (D.C. Cir. 1999), reh’g denied en banc, No. 98-5043, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5954 (Apr. 2, 1999), Petitioners respectfully request that, in its action on this petition, the agency define "significant scientific agreement" in 21 CFR § 101.14 by articulating clearly the principles that guide the agency in reaching its decision such that the Petitioners can perceive the degree, quality, and nature of evidence FDA expects to satisfy its standard. In addition, and consistent with Pearson, if the agency finds the proposed claim not to satisfy "significant scientific agreement," the Petitioners request that the agency authorize the claim nevertheless, with such disclaimer or disclaimers as the agency reasonably deems necessary to avoid a potentially misleading connotation.
II. Preliminary Requirements
A. Vitamin E meets the definitions of 21 CFR 101.14(a) and (b).
This petition seeks FDA approval of the proposed claim for use on dietary supplements of vitamin E manufactured in accordance with U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) specifications. Vitamin E meets the definition of a "substance" provided by 21 CFR § 101.14(a). "Substance" is defined as a food or a component of food regardless of whether the food is in conventional or dietary supplement form. The subject of this petition is α-tocopherol that is a 16-carbon phenol with three chiral centers. The natural form of α-tocopherol is the isomer 2R, 4΄R, 8R΄- α-tocopherol (RRR- α-tocopherol) and known as d-α-tocopherol. Vitamin E is a component of foods found naturally in conventional foods such as fats, oils, meats, poultry, fish, eggs, dairy products, and sugars.and dairy products. The synthetic form has the chemical name of all-racermic- α-tocopherol or dl-α-tocopherol and contains all eight stereoisomers. Both the natural and synthetic forms of α-tocopherol (vitamin E) inhibit the oxidation of the LDL activities by similar actions (Devaraj, 1996; Pryor Report at 6). The natural vitamin E, however, is more efficient than its synthetic counterpart (Pryor Report at 5-6). For stability and for longer shelf life, supplemental vitamin E is usually formulated as the esters α-tocopherol acetate and/or α-tocopherol succinate. The subject of this petition includes the alpha tocopherol esters such as acetate and succinate (USP 23-NF18 and USP-DI, Attachment 4).
The proposed health claim conforms to the relevant requirements of 21 CFR § 101.14(b). Section 101.14(b) provides:
(b) Eligibility. For a substance to be eligible for a health claim:
(1) The substance must be associated with a disease or health-related condition for which the general U.S. population, or an identified U.S. population subgroup (e.g., the elderly), is at risk, or, alternatively, the petition submitted by the proponent of the claim otherwise explains the prevalence of the disease or health-related condition in the U.S. population and the relevance of the claim in the context of the total daily diet and satisfies the other requirements of this section.
(2) If the substance is to be consumed as a component of a conventional food at decreased dietary levels, the substance must be a nutrient listed in 21 U.S.C. 343(q)(1)(C) or (q)(1)(D), or one that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has required to be included in the label or labeling under 21 U.S.C. 343(q)(2)(A); or
(3) If the substance is to be consumed at other than decreased dietary levels:
(i) The substance must, regardless of whether the food is a conventional food or a dietary supplement, contribute taste, aroma, or nutritive value, or any other technical effect listed in § 170.3(o) of this chapter, to the food and must retain that attribute when consumed at levels that are necessary to justify a claim; and
(ii) The substance must be a food or a food ingredient or a component of a food ingredient whose use at the levels necessary to justify a claim has been demonstrated by the proponent of the claim, to FDA's satisfaction, to be safe and lawful under the applicable food safety provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Conformance with each requirement of 21 CFR § 101.14(b) is discussed below.
In satisfaction of section 101.14(b)(1), the proposed health claim associates supplemental vitamin E with cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease includes diseases of the heart and circulatory system. Coronary heart disease is the most common and serious form of cardiovascular disease primarily affecting the heart muscle and supporting blood vessels. 21 CFR § 101.75(a) (1999). Coronary heart disease is a major public health concern in the United States, primarily because it accounts for more deaths per year than any other disease or group of diseases. 21 CFR § 101.75(b) (1999). Stroke, a closely related cardiovascular disease, is the third leading cause of death in the U.S. See, CDC, www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastat, 1998. The petitioner meets the requirements of 21 CFR § 101.14(b)(1) by associating vitamin E with a disease for which the general U.S. population is at risk. FDA has determined that the adult population is at risk for coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease.
In conformity with section 101.14(b)(3)(i), vitamin E contributes nutritive value and retains its nutritive attribute when consumed at or above the current Reference Daily Intake (RDI) values. The RDI value for vitamin E is 30 IU/day (21 CFR § 101.9 § 101.9(c)(8)(iv)). The nutritive contribution of vitamin E is widely recognized. The substance is a naturally occurring nutritive component in a wide variety of foods such as fats and oils, meats, poultry, fish, eggs, dairy products, and sugars.and dairy products. FDA recognizes the nutritive values through its nutritional labeling regulation, 21 CFR § 101.9. Section 101.9(c)(8)(iv) states that Vitamin E is essential in human nutrition. The RDI values provided in § 101.9(c)(8)(iv) are an attempt to establish a minimum intake of vitamin E necessary for maintaining adequate nutrition. The proposed health claim promotes intake quantities greater than the RDI values. The nutritive value of the substances are retained at the levels necessary to justify the proposed health claim. Therefore, the proposed health claim meets the requirements of 21 CFR § 101.14(b)(3)(i).
In conformity with section 101.14(b)(3)(ii), vitamin E is both a food and food ingredient and is safe and lawful at the levels necessary to justify the proposed health claim. As mentioned above, vitamin E is a natural ingredient of common foods such as green leafy vegetables, orange juice, and beans.vegetable oils and other high fat content foods. Vitamin E is also commonly sold as a dietary supplement. The FDCA deems dietary supplements a food under 21 U.S.C. §321(ff). Accordingly, vitamin E is both a food and food ingredient according to 21 CFR § 101.14(b)(3)(ii).
Vitamin E is generally recognized as safe and lawful at the levels necessary to justify the proposed health claim. Tocopherols and a -tocopherol acetate are generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practices (21 CFR §§182.8890 and 182.8892). Vitamin E is generally recognized as safe with no pre-determined daily intake limitation under 21 CFR § 184.1676.
The maximum (safe) daily intake of vitamin E is generally limited to the amount reasonably required to accomplish an intended nutritive effect. 21 CFR § 172.5 (1999). Accordingly, vitamin E is generally recognized as safe at any daily intake level justified for a particular nutritive effect. The safe upper limit for vitamin E has not been established but has generally been set at above 800 IU /day and has been shown to be safe at intake levels up to 3,200 IU per day (Bendich, 1988). The proposed health claim promotes dietary intakes that are well below the safety levels established by the scientific community. Therefore, the proposed health claims comply with the safety and lawfulness requirements of 21 CFR § 101.14(b)(3)(ii).
The safety of the proposed health claim can also be shown when examining the dietary habits of the general U.S. population. Less than 30 % of the American population consume 30 IU or more of vitamin E per day. USDA, Nationwide food consumption survey: continuing survey of food intakes by individuals: men 19-50 years, 1985, and Nationwide food consumption survey: continuing survey of food intakes by individuals: women 19-50 years and their children 1-5 years, 1985, Report Nos. 85-3 and 85-4, Nutrition Monitoring Division, Human Nutrition Information Service, 1986. Since the proposed claim promotes an intake level well within the upper safety limit, even when considering the possibility of increased consumption, any safety concerns of over consumption are mitigated.
In summary, since vitamin E meets the requirements set forth in 21 CFR § 101.14(b), the preliminary requirements of 21 CFR § 101.70 are fully satisfied.
III. Summary of Scientific Data Supporting the Proposed Claim
A. Significant scientific agreement exists to support the proposed claim
There exists significant agreement among experts who study the field of cardiovascular disease concerning the association between vitamin E and heart disease risk factors. See, Pryor Report, Attachment 2. Results of epidemiological studies support the inverse association between Vitamin E and risk of heart disease. (Kushi, 1999, Steinberg, 1992). Summaries of those meta-analyses and literature surveys discussing the inverse relationship between vitamin E and heart disease risk are presented below:
The Shute brothers of London, Ontario, addressed the therapeutic properties of Vitamin E more than 50 years ago. Vitamin E's cardiovascular protective properties have gained acceptance in the medical community over the past two decades. A recent study of 181 American cardiologists found that more than 44% personally take antioxidant supplements with Vitamin E, the most common antioxidant for cardiovascular health protection (Mehta,1997; Pryor Report at 2-3).
William A. Pryor, PhD, has investigated the field of free radical chemistry for more than 43 years. He has published more than 350 peer-reviewed scientific journal articles and 25 books. He is the co-editor-in-chief of the Elsevier journal Free Radical Biology & Medicine and editor of the annual Vitamin E & Carotenoids, which reviews the health implications of publications concerning vitamin E, carotenoids, and other antioxidant nutrients. Based on his investigations and extensive review of scientific literature, Dr. Pryor has concluded that "the mass of data leaves little doubt that vitamin E provides important and significant protection both to those without diagnosed heart conditions and to those with proven heart disease." (Pryor Report at 32).
Vitamin E’s unique and powerful antioxidative properties protect the vascular system from the pathogenic effects of oxidative events that lead to atherosclerosis (Pryor Report at 6-11; Table 1). Atherosclerosis is the principal cause of heart attacks and stroke (Ross, 1993). Atherosclerosis results from insults to the endothelium and smooth muscle cells of arterial walls. Inflammation plays a role in the development of the fibrous and fibrofatty atherosclerotic lesions. (Ross, 1993). Macrophages have specific receptors for oxidized LDL, readily take up that material, and when overloaded by high oxidized LDL levels, degenerate into the 1993)foam cells found in atherosclerosis plaques. There is significant scientific agreement among qualified experts that there is a direct relationship between platelet adhesiveness and heart disease risk. In addition, growth factors, cytokines and vasoregulatory molecules contribute to the pathogenic process. LDL oxidation, for example, increases monocyte adherence, transmigration, and macrophage formation and activation, thus promoting atherosclerosis development. (Ross, 1993; Steinberg, 1992; Southorn, 1988). Oxidized LDL is potentially more atherogenic than "native" LDL. (Steinberg, 1992; Haberland, 1992). Vitamin E inhibits LDL oxidation that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. (Azen, 1996; Azzi, 1998; Haberland, 1992; Henning, 1993; Pryor Report at 6-11).
In addition, vitamin E reduces platelet adhesion associated with transient ischemic attacks and atherosclerosis (Tran, 1996; Yoshikawa, 1998; Kanzhi, 1992; Mark, 1996 and 1997; Martin, 1997; Steiner, 1993; and Freedman, 1996). It protects against cellular damage caused by autoxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) that are present in most cells and cell membranes and are very susceptible to autoxidation. (Tran, 1996; Esterbauer, 1991; Keaney, 1994; Pryor Report at 9). Vitamin E further protects the body by reducing the damage caused by prostoglandins formed by oxidation of the PUFA arachidonate (Chan, 1993, 1991, 1988; Ferns, 1993). Vitamin E also protects against nitrogen dioxide free radical reactions with PUFA’s. (Chan, 1998; Pryor Report at 8).
There is significant scientific agreement among qualified experts that there is an inverse relationship between the consumption of vitamin E and heart disease risk. Dozens of published scientific articles reporting results of human cohort and controlled clinical trials have examined the vitamin E/cardiovascular disease risk relationship (Table 1). Additional support for the proposed health claim is found in evidence from experimental, animal and other studies (Table 2). By contrast, weak or no associations between vitamin E and heart disease were revealed in the studies listed in Table 3. The results of those studies do not, however, refute the overwhelming evidence in support of the proposed health claim (Pryor Report at 18-24). Many of those studies suffer from severe methodological limitations such as (a) studies limited to a very small sample size; (b) studies involving populations of smokers (that have far higher levels of oxidative stress than non-smokers) or mixed smoker/non-smoker populations; (c) studies using very small doses of vitamin E; and (d) studies failing to measure non-fatal cardiac events or diseases or measuring only non-cardiac endpoints. In addition, many of those studies had very small gradient differences in vitamin E intake making conclusions concerning associations invalid. The beneficial effects of vitamin E in those studies may be hidden and/or counteracted by confounding factors that are known to increase the risk of heart disease such as smoking, high fat intake, high cholesterol levels, and increased systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The serum studies measured plasma levels at a point in time far removed in events (serum frozen for 20 years in some cases). The stability and accuracy of measuring vitamin E concentrations using that method is highly questionable. Most of the authors who reviewed available literature and found that a public health recommendation for increased consumption of vitamin E was not justified did note that the observational and epidemiologic data did indicate an inverse relationship between vitamin E and heart disease. In addition, many of those reviewers made their recommendations on antioxidants in general. When vitamin E is examined, the evidence for the health claim remains compelling (Pryor Report at 27). Lonn (1997), for example, concluded from a review of epidemiologic and clinical trials that the data are inconclusive and should wait before making widespread recommendations for supplements. That conclusion was based on an evaluation of antioxidants in general rather than an evaluation of vitamin E in particular. The researchers’ detailed analyses, however, demonstrate a significant inverse association between Vitamin E use and heart disease, especially among supplement users. Van de Vijer (1997) conducted an extensive review of antioxidants and concluded that "general preventive measures based on antioxidant supplementation are not justifiable on the basis of current knowledge, although there is certainly support for a preventive effect of high doses of vitamin E on cardiovascular disease risk."
Most researchers note that in order to determine the exact extent to which vitamin E intake reduces cardiovascular disease risk would be extremely difficult and cost prohibitive (Tangney, 1997, Pryor Report 33). The available data do not indicate that intake of vitamin E at levels consistent with the proposed health claim poses a health risk and the potential benefits are significant as indicated by the following:
The studies that found a strong association between vitamin E intake and a reduced risk of heart disease examined the effects of both natural and synthetic vitamin E preparations. Natural vitamin E, d-α-tocopherol, consistently demonstrated therapeutic effects at levels of 100-400 IU/day (See Table 1). The threshold level for synthetic vitamin E, dl-α-tocopherol, has been demonstrated to be 400 IU/day (Fuller, 1997; Table 1). The specific dose response studies indicate that 400 IU/day of either d-α-tocopherol or dl-α-tocopherol is needed to significantly decrease LDL susceptibility to oxidation and thus reduce the risk of atherosclerosis and heart disease development (Devaraj, 1997; Jialal, 1995).
In summary, an overwhelming majority of the aforementioned scientific articles support the proposed health claim. The conclusions of the authors demonstrate that there is significant scientific agreement among qualified experts. Those experts repeatedly conclude that there is (1) an inverse relationship between vitamin E and heart disease risk, (2) a direct relationship between LDL oxidation and heart disease risk, (3) an inverse relationship between vitamin E and LDL oxidation, and (4) supplemental quantities of vitamin E show protective effects against cardiovascular disease more conclusively than dietary vitamin E. Accordingly, FDA should respect the well-considered conclusions of scientific experts on the cardiovascular benefits of vitamin E and approve the proposed claims.
The amount of d-α-tocopherol or dl-α-tocopherol contained in a dietary supplement that may be a candidate for bearing the health claims can be ascertained by standard assay methods (Attachment 3). The USP assay methods described in the USP 23-NF 18 (1995) are applicable to finished products.
V. Proposed Model Claim
Petitioners propose the following Model Claims for Vitamin E and heart disease risk:
VI. Attachments
Attached are copies of the scientific studies and other information referenced in, and constituting the basis for, this Petition. To the best of the Petitioners' knowledge, all non-clinical studies relied upon were conducted in compliance with the good laboratory practices regulations set forth at 21 CFR Part 58, and all clinical or other human investigations relied upon were either conducted in accordance with the requirements for institutional review set forth at 21 CFR Part 56 or were not subject to such requirements in accordance with 21 CFR §§ 56.104 or 56.105, and were conducted in conformance with the requirements for informed consent set forth in 21 CFR § 50 et seq. See generally, 21 CFR § 101.70 (c)-(d).
VII. Environmental Impact
The requested health claim approval contained in this petition is categorically excluded under 21 C.F.R. § 25.24.
VIII. Conclusion and Certification
For the foregoing reasons, the Petitioners request that the FDA approve the proposed health claims. The Petitioners look forward to working with the FDA in promulgating a regulation authorizing the use of dietary supplement health claims concerning the association between vitamin E and reduction in the risk of heart disease.
Any questions concerning this Petition may be directed to Jonathan W. Emord, Esq., Emord & Associates, P.C., 1050 Seventeenth Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington DC 20036, (202) 466-6937.
The undersigned certify on behalf of the Petitioners that to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Petition includes all information and views on which the Petitioners rely and is a representative and balanced submission that includes unfavorable information as well as favorable information, known by the Petitioners to be pertinent to evaluation of the proposed health claims.
Sincerely,
JULIAN M. WHITAKER, M.D.;
DURK PEARSON AND SANDY SHAW;
AMERICAN PREVENTIVE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; and PURE ENCAPSULATIONS, INC.
By________________________________________
Jonathan W. Emord
Eleanor A. Kolton
Their Counsel
Jonathan W. Emord
Eleanor A. Kolton
Emord & Associates, P.C.
1050 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20036
P: (202) 466-6937
F: (202) 466-6938
e-mail: Emordal1@erols.com
Date: July 6, 1999
Table 1: Studies demonstrating the inverse relationship between vitamin E and heart disease risk.
|
Study Identification |
Study Size |
Duration |
Results/Conclusions |
|
146 |
4-year cohort |
Supplementary Vitamin E(≥ 100 IU/ day) reduced progression of atherosclerosis |
|
|
Epidemiological study of 19 Western European and 5 non-European Countries |
17 years of data examined |
Vitamin E inversely related to CHD (r= -0.8 across Europe) |
|
|
Cross Sectional Survey (N=143 men and 138 women ) and Case Controlled Study (N= 52) of Czecoslovakian compared to British civil servants |
Point Study |
Low plasma Vitamin E levels inversely associated with CHD/MI risk in both segments of the study |
|
|
Cross Sectional Survey (N=143 men and 138 women ) and Case Controlled Study (N= 52) of Czechoslovakian compared to British civil servants |
Point Study |
Low plasma Vitamin E levels inversely associated with CHD/MI risk in both segments of the study |
|
|
Cross sectional epidemiological study of (N=1187) |
4 years |
Vitamin E exerts a protective effect against atherogenesis in elderly population with low levels of atherosclerosis; Lipid peroxidation positively associated with atherogenesis |
|
(1997) |
Controlled Study (N= 10) |
16 weeks |
Treatment with Vitamin E (200 IU dl-α-tocopherol/ day) and C decreases lipid peroxidation and cortisol and increases phagocyte, chemotaxis, neutrophil, and lymphocyte activity and levels, counteracting impaired immune function and increased lipid peroxidation and cortisol associated with CHD. |
|
|
Case controlled study (N=41) |
Point Study |
Vitamins A and E are independently associated with increased CAD risk. |
|
|
Case controlled study (N=41) |
Point Study |
Vitamins A and E are independently and inversely associated with increased CAD risk. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=79) |
8 weeks |
The threshold for LDL oxidation protection efficacy is ≥ 400 IU/day of Vitamin E (RRR-α-tocopherol / d-α-tocopherol and all-rac- α-tocopherol / dl-α-tocopherol). |
|
|
Controlled study (N=21) |
14 weeks |
Vitamin E supplementation (1,200 IU d-α-tocopherol) produced antiathergenic intracelllular effects: decrease LDL oxidation and inhibit release of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion. Vitamin E supplementation also suppresses cytokine, IL-1ß, and inhibits monocyte-endothelial cell adhesion. |
|
|
Controlled study (N=21) |
14 weeks |
Vitamin E supplementation (1,200 IU d-α-tocopherol) produced antiatherogenic intracellular effects: decreased LDL oxidation and inhibited release of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion. Vitamin E supplementation also suppressed cytokine, IL-1ß, and inhibited monocyte-endothelial cell adhesion. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=12) |
3 weeks |
Vitamin E supplementation (≥ 150 IU/day d-α-tocopherol) increases LDL oxidation resistance |
|
|
Case controlled study (N=40) |
Point study |
Vitamin E levels are strongly inversely associated with CHD |
Table 1. Studies demonstrating the inverse relationship between vitamin E and heart disease risk (continued).
|
|
12-year follow up to longitudnal study of 2,974 subjects |
Longitudinal follow up |
Vitamin and other antioxidants are inversely associated with cardiovascular disease |
|
|
12-year follow up to longitudnal study of 2,974 subjects |
Longitudinal follow up |
Vitamin E and other antioxidants are inversely associated with cardiovascular disease |
|
|
Cross cultural (16 countries) |
3 year history examined |
Vitamin E shows strong inverse correlation with heart disease |
|
|
Controlled comparison study (N=47) |
2-5years |
Subjects treated with Vitamin E (300 mg/day d-α-tocopherol) showed significantly more improvement than other treatment groups in symptoms of this occlusive arterial disease. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=156) |
4 years |
Subjects with intake of ≥ 100 IU/ day of Vitamin E per day (supplements) demonstrated less coronary artery lesion progression than did subjects with less than 100 IU Vitamin E per day supplementation. |
|
|
Ex vivo |
|
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) in doses equivalent to 400-1,200 IU /day is an effective inhibitor of platelet adhesion |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=24) |
3months |
Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol 800 IU/ day) inhibits LDL oxidation as effectively as Vitamin E combined with beta-carotene and ascorbate. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=48) |
8 weeks |
The minimum dose of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) to significantly reduce susceptibility of LDL to oxidation is 400 IU/ day. |
|
|
Longitudinal study (N= 5,133) |
16 years |
High Vitamin E and C intake inversely related to coronary heart disease |
|
(1997) |
Case controlled study 50 stable angina patients and 50 unstable angina patients compared to 100 healthy subjects |
|
Lipid peroxidation is increased in patients with unstable angina pectoris compared to stable angina patients and controls. Patients with coronary artery disease had lower vitamin E levels than healthy subjects, and unstable angina patients had lower vitamin E levels than stable angina patients. |
|
|
Cohort study (N=34,486) |
|
Vitamin E intake inversely associated with risk of death from coronary heart disease. |
|
|
Epidemiological study of elderly population (N=11,178) |
9 years |
Vitamin E intake (≥ 100 IU/ day) in supplement form significantly reduced the risk of coronary disease and all cause mortality |
|
|
Cohort (N=2313) |
6 years |
Daily multivitamin supplementation is inversely associated with heart disease and Vitamin E is more consistently and more strongly associated with lower incidence of heart disease than any other vitamin |
Table 1. Studies demonstrating the inverse relationship between vitamin E and heart disease risk (continued).
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=45) |
12 weeks |
Daily supplementation with 800 IU of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol), 1,000 mg of Vitamin C, and 24 of mg beta-carotene produced a significant reduction in the susceptibility of LDL-C to oxidation in patients with cardiovascular disease. The increased resistance to oxidation was greater in preparations with 800 IU than 400 IU of Vitamin E. |
|
|
Case controlled study (N=29) |
Point study |
Vitamin E levels are inversely associated with coronary artery spasm |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=120) |
4 weeks |
Vitamin E (α-tocopherol acetate 300 mg/ day) improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with coronary spastic angina |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=40) |
|
Daily supplementation with 200 IU of Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol), 400 mg of ascorbic acid, 100 mcg of selenium, and 30 of mg beta-carotene produced a significant increased oxidative resistance of atherogenic lipoproteins. Vitamin E accounted for the majority of the increased lag time parameter |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=40) |
|
Daily supplementation with 200 IU of Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol), 400 mg of ascorbic acid, 100 mcg of selenium, and 30 mg beta-carotene produced a significantly increased oxidative resistance of atherogenic lipoproteins. Vitamin E accounted for the majority of the increased lag time parameter |
|
|
Case controlled Study (N=25) |
3 months |
Decreasing LDL oxidative susceptabily is a key component in attenuating atherosclerosis or causing regression of atheroscleotic lesions. In the effective atherosclerosis treatment used in this study, 50% of the LDL oxidative variation was attributed to Vitamin E levels. |
|
|
Case controlled Study (N=25) |
3 months |
Decreasing LDL oxidative susceptibly is a key component in attenuating atherosclerosis or causing regression of atherosclerotic lesions. In the effective atherosclerosis treatment used in this study, 50% of the LDL oxidative variation was attributed to Vitamin E levels. |
|
|
Case controlled (N=20) |
12 weeks |
In this dose response study, daily Vitamin E supplementation (dl-α-tocopherol) of 400 IU and 800 IU significantly increased LDL oxidative resistance compared to lower doses. |
|
|
Placebo and Case controlled comparative studies (N= 6 and 46) |
7 days treatment and 8 week follow up, 14 weeks |
Vitamin E (1,000 IU/ day of dl-α-tocopherol) increases LDL oxidative resistance. Beta-carotene did not affect LDL susceptibility to oxidation. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=22,269) |
4.7 years (mean) |
Daily supplements of 50 IU/day of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) (which is one-third to one-eighth the minimum doses required as demonstrated in other studies) by smokers without coronary heart disease slightly reduced the incidence of angina pectoris. |
|
|
Comparative case controlled study (N=8) |
14 months |
Daily supplementation with 1,600 IU of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) reduced LDL susceptibility by 50%. |
|
|
Comparative case controlled study (N=8) |
14 months |
Daily supplementation with 1,600 IU of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) reduced LDL susceptibility to oxidation by 50%. |
|
|
Case controlled study (N=99) |
|
Strong inverse association between Vitamin E levels and severity of coronary artery disease and stenosis |
|
|
Case controlled study (N=125:430) |
|
Plasma Vitamin E levels are inversely associated with angina pectoris risk. That association is independent of other risk factors. |
Table 1. Studies demonstrating the inverse relationship between vitamin E and heart disease risk (continued).
|
|
Case controlled study (N=110:394) |
|
Low plasma Vitamin E levels are associated with an increased risk of angina, that risk remained significant after adjustments for age, blood pressure, cholesterols, triglycerides, weight and smoking status. |
|
|
Prospective follow up study (N=39,910) |
4 years |
Inverse association between high Vitamin E intake (≥ 100 IU/ day) in supplement form for 2 or more years and risk of coronary heart disease in men. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=42) |
Six weeks |
In this dose response study, 500 IU Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) significantly reduced LDL susceptibility to oxidation and 500 IU/day demonstrated a threshold effect when compared 1,000 IU or 1,500 per day |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=42) |
Six weeks |
In this dose response study, 500 IU Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) significantly reduced LDL susceptibility to oxidation and 500 IU/day demonstrated a threshold effect when compared to 1,000 IU or 1,500 per day |
|
|
Prospective follow up study (N=87,245) |
8 years |
The use of Vitamin E supplements among middle aged women is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease. The risk reduction is strongest in those who took ≥ 100 IU/ day and that risk reduction reaches 41% after two or more years of using supplements. |
|
|
Prospective follow up study (N=87,245) |
8 years |
The use of Vitamin E supplements among middle aged women is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease. The risk reduction is strongest in those who took ≥ 100 IU/ day and that risk reduction reaches 41% after two or more years of using supplements. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=100) |
2 years |
Subjects with transient ischemic attacks who received Vitamin E (400 IU /day) in combination with aspirin had significantly reduced platelet adhesiveness than those taking aspirin alone. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=100) |
2 years |
Subjects with transient ischemic attacks who received Vitamin E (400 IU /day) in combination with aspirin had significantly reduced platelet adhesiveness compared to those taking aspirin alone. |
|
|
Randomized controlled study (N=2002) |
17 months (mean) |
Daily intake of 400-800 IU of Vitamin E reduced risk of non-fatal heart attacks in those who have angiographically proven symptomatic coronary atherosclerosis by as much as 70%. |
|
|
Comaparative double blind study (N=132) |
6 years |
Subjects with daily intake of 100 mg of Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) supplements exhibited significantly fewer signs of coronary disorders (EKG abnormalities, atherosclerosis, cholesterol rations) than the subjects whose intake was negligible (3 mg/ day ). |
|
|
Comaparative double blind study (N=132) |
6 years |
Subjects with daily intake of 100 mg of Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) supplements exhibited significantly fewer signs of coronary disorders (EKG abnormalities, atherosclerosis, cholesterol ratios) than the subjects whose intake was negligible (3 mg/ day ). |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=74) |
26.8 months |
Daily intake of 400 IU of Vitamin E (dl- α-tocopherol) improved claudication distance (up to 243%) compared to placebo (112%). |
Table 2. Additional studies supporting the role of Vitamin E in reducing heart disease risk.
|
Study Identification |
Type and Size |
Conclusions |
|
Observational 946 men and 946 women |
Inverse correlation between intake of Vitamins E and C and Carotene and CHD |
|
|
Epidemiological 40 countries |
Although France and Finland have similar population intakes of cholesterol and saturated fats, France has significantly lower CHD rates. Major dietary difference includes level of antioxidant intake, including vitamin E. May explain the "French paradox" |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E controls and inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation (vascular walls): mechanism of action of protection against progression of atherosclerosis |
|
|
Cross Sectional Survey and Case Controlled (1069 men (3828 controls)and 1053 women (3790 controls)) |
Intake of Vitamins A, C, E and beta-carotene are inversely associated with CHD, especially in men. |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E controls and inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation (vascular walls): mechanism of action of protection against progression of atherosclerosis |
|
|
animal |
Vitamin E inhibits LDL oxidation and slows progression of atherosclerosis in rabbits |
|
|
In vitro |
Demonstrates mechanism to maintain Vitamin E in platelet cell membranes as protection against to oxidative stress |
|
|
In vitro |
Demonstrates mechanism to maintain Vitamin E in platelet cell membranes as protection against oxidative stress |
|
|
In vitro |
Demonstrates a mechanism of action by which Vitamin E controls and inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation |
|
|
In vitro |
LDL oxidation increases vascular cell adhesion, Vitamin E inhibited that action |
|
|
Controlled trial (N=10) |
Vitamin E supplementation reduced leukoteine levels. Excess leukoteines are associated with increased incidence of CHD. |
|
|
Controlled trial (N=10) |
Vitamin E supplementation reduced leukotriene levels. Excess leukotrienes are associated with increased incidence of CHD. |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E increases LDL resistance to oxidation |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E exhibits anitatherogenic properties by inhibiting moncytotic cell adhesions to human endothelial cells |
|
|
In vitro |
At levels consistent with oral supplementation, Vitamin E inhibits platelet aggregation and adhesion. |
Table 2. Additional studies supporting the role of Vitamin E in reducing heart disease risk (continued).
|
|
Animal |
Vitamin E increases LDL resistance to oxidation and preserves endothelial vasodilator function. |
|
|
Controlled study (N=46) |
Increased LDL oxidation is significantly associated with coronary disease |
|
|
In vitro |
Mitochondria function is involved with LDL oxidation and subsequent atherogenic changes in vascular endothelial cells and those effects increase with aging |
|
|
Randomized nutritional intervention trials (N=29,584) |
Users of antioxidants (Vitamin E, beta-carotene, and selenium) in supplement form had decreased hypertension and stroke mortality. |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) has an inhibitory effect on LDL-induced production of adhesion molecules and adhesion of monocytes to arotic endothelial cells |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) has an inhibitory effect on LDL-induced production of adhesion molecules and adhesion of monocytes to aortic endothelial cells |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=88) |
Intake of at least 200 IU of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) supplements improves the immune response of elderly individuals and is not associated with any adverse effects. Age associated decline in immune response is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the elderly (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are the leading causes of death in that population). |
|
|
In vitro |
Peroxidative stress increases monocytic endothelial adhesion in vascular endothelial cells (adherence of monocytes to endothelium is an early event in atherogenesis). |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) inhibits both cell proliferation and protein kinease activity by activating the release of transforming growth factor-β from smooth muscle, counteracting the effects of LDL that activate growth. |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) inhibits both cell proliferation and protein kinase activity by activating the release of transforming growth factor-β from smooth muscle, counteracting the effects of LDL that activate growth. |
|
|
Animal |
Oxidative stress is an independent causative factor of atherosclerosis |
|
|
In vitro |
Very low-density lipoproteins and oxidized LDLs support assemblage of prothrombinase complex and generation of thrombin. Vitamin E exerts a protective effect against increased LDL supported thrombin formation by decreasing LDL oxidation. |
|
|
In vitro |
Larger doses of antioxidants are required when perioxidases are present (such as in smokers) to prevent propagation oxidative reactions. The mechanism demonstrated in this study may account for the lack of effect of low-doses of vitamin E. |
|
|
In vitro |
Larger doses of antioxidants are required when peroxidases are present (such as in smokers) to prevent propagation of oxidative reactions. The mechanism demonstrated in this study may account for the lack of effect of low-doses of vitamin E. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=148) |
Daily supplementation with 400 IU of Vitamin E (α-tocopherol acetate), 1,000 mg of Vitamin C, 50,000 IU of Vitamin A, and 25 mg Beta-carotene resulted in significantly decreased serum lipid perioxides, less occurrence of angina, arrhythmias, poor left ventricular function, and cardiac endpoints compared to placebo. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=148) |
Daily supplementation with 400 IU of Vitamin E (α-tocopherol acetate), 1,000 mg of Vitamin C, 50,000 IU of Vitamin A, and 25 mg Beta-carotene resulted in significantly decreased serum lipid peroxides, less occurrence of angina, arrhythmias, poor left ventricular function, and cardiac endpoints compared to placebo. |
|
Smith (1987) |
Animal |
Vitamin E reduces lipid ion and thickness of the arotic intima in the presence of hyperlipidemia. |
|
|
Animal |
Vitamin E reduces lipid peroxidation and thickness of the aortic intima in the presence of hyperlipidemia. |
Table 2. Additional studies supporting the role of Vitamin E in reducing heart disease risk (continued).
|
|
Animal |
Chronic exposure of arterial endothelial cells to oxidized LDL interferes with the production ad release of prostacyclin and thus increases the progression of fatty streaks to atherosclerotic lesions. |
|
|
Animal |
Chronic exposure of arterial endothelial cells to oxidized LDL interferes with the production and release of prostacyclin and thus increases the progression of fatty streaks to atherosclerotic lesions. |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol and dl-α-tocopherol) stimulates PGI production in vascular endothelial cells. PGI has anti-platelet-aggregating and vasodilation properties as well as cytoprotective qualities. |
|
|
Animal |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) potentiates arachidonate release |
|
|
Animal |
Monkeys treated with daily supplementation of 108 IU of Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) for 36 months had less arterial stenosis than the untreated group. Both groups were fed an atherogenic diet. |
|
|
Animal |
Vitamin E protects LDL against oxidation and contributes to the inhibition of early atherosclerotic lesions |
|
|
Animal |
Vitamin E treated rabbits exhibited lower cholesterol levels than untreated rabbits |
|
|
Animal |
Vitamin E and selenium treated rabbits reduced atherosclerotic plaque formation |
|
|
Animal |
Vitamin E and selenium treated rabbits had reduced atherosclerotic plaque formation |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) inhibits neutrophil-endolelial cell adhesive reactions with vascular endothelial cells. |
|
|
In vitro |
Vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol) inhibits neutrophil-endothelelial cell adhesive reactions with vascular endothelial cells. |
Table 3. Studies with conclusions not supportive of effects of Vitamin E on heart disease risk.
|
Trials |
Type of Study Sample Size |
Results |
Comments |
|
Longitudinal (N= 1,843) |
Vitamin C , beta carotene, and overall antioxidant status inversely related to strokes but not to a significant degree |
Dietary intake interviews done at baseline and changing habits or supplementation not included, did not ascertain Vitamin E effects separately, authors questioned the accuracy of stroke diagnosis as cause of death. |
|
|
Placebo controlled N=100 |
Vitamin E treated group exhibited less restenosis than placebo |
According to the authors, the difference did not reach statistical significance because of the small sample size. |
|
|
Nested case controlled study (N=734) |
No association between serum plasma concentrations of antioxidant vitamins and cardiovascular disease/ |
This was a point study that was far removed in events (serum frozen for 20 years), Vitamin E supplementation was not involved, authors note that the study results exhibit a lack of power, and mixed results smokers vs. nonsmokers |
|
|
Double-blind cross-over study (N=48) |
No association between Vitamin E and improvement of exercise capacity, improved left ventricular function, or reduction in chest pain in patients with stable angina |
Six month study, may have truncated induction period (other studies indicate results will not be noted for 12-18 months). No side effects were noted, no exacerbation of hypertension, congestive heart failure or skeletal muscular complaints. Concomitant use with nitroglycerine: unknown implication. |
|
|
Controlled study (N=207) |
No independent correlation between Vitamin E and LDL oxidation associated with coronary artery disease |
LDL oxidation established as an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease; Confounding factors for a study of subjects with confirmed disease may be dietary changes that were not analyzed in this study. LDL densities and fatty acid content may also have influenced the results. |
|
|
Cohort study of the population based MONICA study (7 year follow up study) |
No statistical association between Vitamin E and myocardial infarction |
The population had a higher than average level of vitamin E and the authors suggest that the lack of association between Vitamin E levels and MI may be due to that characteristic and the limited statistical power of the study. |
Table 3. Studies with conclusions not supportive of effects of Vitamin E on heart disease risk (continued).
|
|
Controlled multi-center study (N=1410) |
No association seen with dietary intake of Vitamin E |
Study analyzed levels of antioxidants in adipose tissue and correlated those levels to MI risk factors, did not study supplemental Vitamin E use or dietary intake |
|
|
Cohort study (N=552) |
No association seen between vitamin E and stroke risk. |
Study based on dietary history and Vitamin E supplementation was very rare and the variation in Vitamin E intake was very slight |
|
|
Cohort study (N=552) |
No association seen between vitamin E and stroke risk. |
Study based on dietary history, Vitamin E supplementation was very rare, and the variation in Vitamin E intake was very slight |
|
|
Longitudinal Study (N=10,532) |
No association seen between vitamin E and cardiovascular mortality |
Study did not measure nonfatal cardiovascular events, study relied on long term storage of serum, authors note that the subgroup analyses were based on a very small number of cases and limit the strength of the statistical power |
|
|
Cohort study of cross cultural survey (N=12,763) |
Dietary antioxidants do not account for differences in coronary disease mortality independent of saturated fats and flavanoids |
Study did not measure nonfatal coronary events nor did it study supplemental Vitamin E use. Results did indicate that CHD mortality was highest in Finland where diets were highest in fats and lowest in antioxidant vitamins. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=1862) |
Neither vitamin E or Beta carotene decreased the incidence or risk of coronary events in men with confirmed heart disease |
Study assessed effect of equivalent of 50 IU/day of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) which is one-third to one-eighth the minimum doses required as demonstrated in other studies. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N= 1795) |
Neither vitamin E or Beta carotene inhibited the progression in severity of angina pectoris |
Study assessed effect of equivalent of 50 IU/day of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) which is one-third to one-eighth the minimum doses required as demonstrated in other studies. In addition the study was limited to smokers whose antioxidant requirements are significantly higher than a non-smoking population |
|
|
Cross cultural (four regions) |
Plasma antioxidants are not associated with regional differences in CHD mortality |
The authors note that once adjustments are made for cholesterol, Vitamin E levels were inversely associated with CHD across regions. The authors note that the gradient in CHD differences may have been too small. In addition, the study did not measure non-fatal events. |
Table 3. Studies with conclusions not supportive of effects of Vitamin E on heart disease risk (continued).
|
|
Case controlled prospective study (N=725) |
Vitamin E intake is not associated with mortality in this elderly population |
The assessed Vitamin E supplementation was well below the minimum amounts required as demonstrated in other studies. The highest quartile intakes of Vitamin E were less than 400 IU/ day and that higher level was inversely associated with heart disease mortality. Nonfatal events were not measured. Adjustments for cholesterol and analysis of Vitamin E alone was not available. No evaluation of the type of supplements (natural or synthetic) or duration of daily consumption were also not available. |
|
|
Case Controlled cohort study (N=92: 92) |
Plasma Vitamin E concentration is not associated with risk of death from coronary heart disease. |
The gradient differences in vitamin E levels may have been too small to determine an association. In addition, the study did not measure non-fatal events. |
|
|
Nested case controlleed study (N=123) |
Serum vitamin E was associated with a protective cardiac effect only among those with high cholesterol levels. |
This study was based on dietary intake only and the sources of vitamin E were highly saturated fats. The treatment group subjects exhibited more known cardiovascular disease risk factors than controls: higher ratio of smokers to non-smokers, significantly higher diastolic blood pressure, and significantly higher total cholesterol levels. The dietary pattern and higher cardiovascular disease risk factor present confounding factors that may interfere with any beneficial effect that low levels of vitamin E may exert. |
|
|
Nested case controlleed study (N=123) |
Serum vitamin E was associated with a protective cardiac effect only among those with high cholesterol levels. |
This study was based on dietary intake only and the sources of vitamin E included many saturated fats. The treatment group subjects exhibited more known cardiovascular disease risk factors than controls: higher ratio of smokers to non-smokers, significantly higher diastolic blood pressure, and significantly higher total cholesterol levels. The dietary pattern and higher cardiovascular disease risk factor present confounding factors that may interfere with any beneficial effect that low levels of vitamin E may exert. |
|
|
Comparative placebo and case controlled study (N=117) |
Vitamin E did not reduce occurrence and severity of restenosis after angioplasty |
The effects of probucol alone was compared to the combination of Vitamins E (700 IU dl-α-tocopherol) and C and beta-carotene, probucol and the vitamins together, and to placebo. The vitamins had no significant effect on the rate of angioplasty. The vitamins were administered one month prior to angioplasty and effects were measured at a point six months after angioplasty. Other studies indicate that the induction time would be much longer and compared to placebo, beneficial results may be expected at a point well beyond the six month point. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=29,133) |
Vitamin E did not prevent intermittent claudication in smokers |
The study evaluated the incidence of occlusive arterial disease of the leg in Smokers received 50 mg/day of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) compared to those who received placebo, beta-carotene, or combination of Vitamin E and beta-carotene. The assessed Vitamin E supplementation was well below the minimum amounts required as demonstrated in other studies one-third to one-eighth the threshold dose. In addition the study was limited to smokers whose antioxidant requirements are significantly higher than a non-smoking population. |
|
|
Placebo controlled study (N=27,271) |
Supplementation with Vitamin E at low doses does not reduce the incidence of non-fatal heart attacks and only marginally decreases the risk of fatal heart attacks. |
Study assessed effect of equivalent of 50 IU/day of Vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol) which is one-third to one-eighth the minimum doses required as demonstrated in other studies. In addition the study was limited to smokers whose antioxidant requirements are significantly higher than a non-smoking population |
REFERENCES FOR VITAMIN E/HEART DISEASE PETITION