Emord & Associates is dedicated to serving the needs of its national client base. The firm’s attorneys represent clients in constitutional and administrative law cases before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the National Park Service (NPS), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

FDA  | USDA | Import | Export | FTC | Advertising | Compliance | Dietary Supplements | Foods | Labeling | Prescription & OTC Drugs | Cosmetics | Animal Feeds & Supplements | DEA  | Controlled Substances | Medicare | Licensing | Commercial Litigation | Contracts | Business | Civil Litigation | Constitutional Law


Copyright © 2010 Emord & Associates, P.C.  All rights reserved | Sitemap  | Washington, D.C. | Virginia | Arizona

PRACTICE AREAS

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law

Advertising Law

Unfair Competition

Import | Export

DEA & Controlled Substances

Medicare Law

Medical Licensing Law

Constitutional Law

Legislative/Constitutional Drafting

General Civil Litigation

Appellate Practice

Communications

Federal Land Management

ADDRESSES:

VIRGINIA (Firm HQ)

11808 Wolf Run Lane

Clifton, VA 20124


WASHINGTON D.C.

1050 Seventeenth Street, N.W.

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20036


ARIZONA

3210 South Gilbert Road

Suite 4

Chandler, AZ  85286


Telephone: (202) 466-6937

Telecopier: (202) 318-2381

Emord & Associates’ lawyers represents clients in all forms of unfair competition proceedings, including plaintiff/defendant Lanham Act litigation, state or federal unfair competition proceedings, and cease-and-desist requests.  Private entities increasingly resort to state and federal unfair competition laws to protect their intellectual property and goodwill.  When a competitor falsely or misleadingly advertises to the detriment of legitimate products, state and federal unfair competition laws often permit private actions to recoup damages or obtain injunctive relief.  

Under federal law, the Lanham Act permits a private right of action against a competitor in federal court for false or misleading advertising.  Remedies under the Lanham Act are broad and may include competitors' profits, general damages, or injunctions preventing future false advertising.

Although unfair competition lawsuits are civil suits in nature, the underlying legal framework is often complex.  The attorneys at Emord & Associates have experience in complex unfair competition litigation, including matters that proceed under state laws and Lanham Act provisions.  

Tapping extensive experience in food, drug, and health law (including more than 20 years experience with health products (e.g., foods, drugs, dietary supplements, and devices)), the lawyers at Emord & Associates are equipped to manage the most complex scientific and emerging issues in the unfair competition context.

Learn more about unfair competition law through our Frequently Asked Questions.  Or contact an attorney at Emord & Associates, P.C.
Unfair Competition & False Advertising

Unfair Competition & False Advertising Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q:  A competitor misrepresents its products, do you have any legal rights against them?


Q:  What is the Lanham Act?


Q:  Can a business be sued is a private action for false advertising?


Q:  What damages are recoverable in a Lanham Act false advertising suit?


Q:  Your company has been sued for false advertising, how much does it cost to defend the lawsuit?


Q:  One of your competitors threatened you with a false advertising or unfair competition lawsuit, do you need counsel to respond?


Q:  What is the NAD and how does it regulate advertising?


See more FAQs

Contact Emord & Associates concerning unfair competition